TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  

March 05, 2015

ISRAEL - IRAN: Benjamin Netanyahu Speech to US Congress 2015




Benjamin Netanyahu Speech to Congress 2015 [FULL] | Today on 3/3/15 | New York Times

Blogger Rough Summary 
[opening portion abridged]:
  • Senate suck up to Netanyahu big time
  • Lots of applause.
  • Truman to Obama support airing.
  • Appreciates Obama.
  • Applause. Applause.  Applause. Applause.  Applause. Applause. 
    Applause. Applause.  Applause. Applause.  Applause. Applause. 
  • Staged?
Senate waaaaay more receptive & supportive of Netanyahu than were the crowd at AIPAC.

US Senators representing corporations, military manufacture, various lobby groups, probably clapping for war.
  • Purim
  • Esther - right to defend against enemies / plot foiled / our ppl were saved
Today, another attempt by Persian potentate to destroy Israel.

Ayatollah Tweet - During Israeli 'Operation Protective Edge' in Gaza.

 [  My warped idea of:  Persia vs Israel through the ages - Image source: tumblr  ]

Mentions Hezbollah.

1979 Iran hijacked by zealots. New constitution.
Ideological mission of jihad.
Founder Khomeini extorted followers to export.

[ Iran is the new #BlamePutin -  ie #BlameIran ]
Every drama in Middle East is sponsored by:
Iran, according to Netanyahu
Global terror network, he claims
Do not believe 
'Iran's aggression' left unchecked / gobbling up the nations.
Iran's march of conquest, subjugation & terror.

Probably should have made that clearer:
I, personally, find this unbelievable (rather than instruction not to believe).
Congress applauds like crazy b/c Netanyahu is painting Iran as responsible for evil around the world. Dumb.

Ideology of Iran 'regime' deeply rooted in Islam / always enemy to America / Iran & Isis competing for crown of militant Islam

Both want to impose: first region & then entire world.
Just can't agree between themselves who will take that crown.

Mentions Islam medieval creed (?) or similar.
Do not share [values]
Intercontinental ballistic missiles & bombs scaremongering.

To defeat ISIS but let Iran get nuclear weapons is to win battle but lose war.
We can't let that happen. Congress applause.

Iran still refuses to come clean about military & nuclear program.
Iran caught TWICE operating secret nuke facilities. Uh-oh.

Facilities, that inspectors didn't even know existed.
Right now, Iran could be hiding nuke facilities we don't know about.

As IAEA inspection authority said 2013:
If no undeclared nuke facilities in Iran, it will be first time in 20 yrs it doesn't

Iran has proven time and again, that it cannot be trusted.
That is why the first major concession
= source of major concern.

Major concession: leaves Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure
& relies on inspectors to prevent a break-out.

Major concession: creates a danger that Iran could get to the bomb by violating the deal.

Major concession creates a second, even greater, danger:
that Iran could get to bomb by keeping the deal.

Danger in concession: virtually all of Iran restrictions would automatically expire in about a decade.

Decade may seem a long time in political life, but it is the blink of an eye in the life of a nation.

We all have responsibility to consider what will happen when Iran's nuclear capabilities are virtually unrestricted.

When Iran's nuclear capabilities are unrestricted, Iran would have capacity to build a huge nuclear capacity: many nuke bombs

Iran supreme leader says Iran plans to have 190,000 centrifuges - 10x what Iran has today - enriching uranium.

With this massive capacity, Iran could make the fuel for an entire nuclear arsenal in a matter of weeks, once it decides.

John Kerry confirmed last week, Iran could legitimately possess massive centrifuge capacity when deal (restriction) expires.

Foremost sponsor of global terrorism could be weeks away from having enough enriched uranium for an entire arsenal nukes ..

Iran intercontinental ballistic missiles program is not part of the deal.
Iran refuses to even put on negotiation table.

Iran intercontinental ballistic missiles prog
= Iran has means to deliver nuke arsenal to far reaching corners world, incl US

Deal has 2 major concessions:

1)     Leaving Iran w vast nuclear prog
2)     Lifting restrictions on prog, in about a decade

= BAD

Deal does not block Iran path to nuclear bomb; it paves Iran path to bomb.
So why would anyone make this deal?

Deal:
>b/c hope Iran will change for better in coming years?
>or believe alternative to this deal is worse?

NETANYAHU disagrees.

Netanyahu does not believe Iran radical regime will change for better after this deal.

Regime in power for 36 yrs Voracious appetite for aggression grows with each passing year
Deal would only whet Iran appetite

Would Iran be less aggressive when sanctions are removed & its economy is stronger?

If Iran gobbling up 4 countries now, while under sanctions, how many more countries will Iran devour when sanctions lifted?

VIDEO – NETANYAHU Speech to Congress -  [10:33]

 Four countries ‘gobbled up’ reference:
1)     Lebanon
2)     Syria
3)     Iraq
4)     Yemen
*Gaza
*Golan Heights
Iran aim: 2nd choke point oil supply.

If sanctions lifted:
Would Iran fund less terrorism when it has mountains of cash with which to fund more terrorism?

Why should Iran's radical regime change for better, when can enjoy best of both worlds:

>aggression abroad
>prosperity at home

Iran's neighbours know Iran will become even more aggressive / more terrorism when its economy is unshackled & path to bomb.

Many of these neighbours say they will respond by racing to get nuclear weapons of their own.
Deal will change ME for worse.

Deal supposed to prevent nuclear proliferation, would instead spark a nuclear arms race in the most dangerous part of planet.

Deal would not be a farewell to arms; it would be a farewell to arms control & ME would be criss-crossed by nuke tripwires.

ME is a region where small skirmishes can trigger big wars.
Deal would turn it into nuclear tinderbox.

Deal with Iran deferring prob. down the road only creating sit'n where a much more dangerous Iran will have to be faced.

A Middle East littered with nuclear bombs
= potential nuclear nightmare.

Solution:
Insist that restrictions will not be lifted as long as Iran continues its aggression in region & the world.

Before lifting restrictions, world should demand Iran do 3 things:

1. Stop aggression against neighbours in ME. ...
2. Stop supporting terrorism around the world.
3. Stop threatening to annihilate Israel, one & only Jewish state.

If world powers won't insist Iran change behaviour before deal is signed, at least insist Iran change before deal *expires*.

If Iran changes behaviour, restrictions would be lifted
If Iran does not change behaviour, restrictions should not be lifted.

If Iran wants to be treated like a normal country, let it act like a normal country.
[cue: standing applause]

Deal argument:

>no alternative to deal
>Iran nuclear knowhow cannot be erased
>prog so advanced & best is delay inevitable

NETANYAHU:
Nuclear knowhow without nuclear INFRASTRUCTURE = no nuclear weapons can be made.

Iran's nuclear prog can be rolled back well beyond current proposal:
>insisting on better deal
>keeping up pressure

Keeping up pressure [would be effective b/c]:
very vulnerable regime, esp. given recent collapse in price of oil.

If Iran threatens to walk from table (this often happens in Persian bazaar), call their bluff.
They'll be back b/c need deal.

By maintaining pressure on Iran (& those who do business w Iran),
you have the power to make them need [deal] even more.

We've been told for over year that no deal is better than a bad deal.
This is a bad deal. Very bad deal.
Better off without.

NOW we are being told only alternative to this bad deal is war.
That's just not true. Alternative to deal:
= much better deal.

A better deal that does not leave Iran w a vast nuclear infrastructure in such a short break-out time.

Better deal
= keeping restrictions on Iran's nuclear program in place until Iran's aggression ends.

Better deal
= won't give Iran easy path to bomb.

No country has a greater stake than Israel in a good deal that peacefully removes this threat.

However difficult, second option would prevent nuclear-armed Iran, nuke armed ME & horrific consequences of both.

Capping off, better deal option:
= security of Israel
= security of Middle East
= peace of world, that we all desire
"My friends, standing up to Iran is not easy.

Standing up to dark & murderous regimes never is." NETANYAHU

With us today is holocaust survivor & Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel
[Seated w Sarah Netanyahu]
[Applause]

[ Elie Wiesel ]
NETANYAHU:
Elie, your life & work inspired us to give meaning to the words: never again.

NETANYAHU:
Wish could promise, Elie, that lessons of history been learned.
Urge leaders of world not to repeat mistakes of past.

Mistakes:
>sacrifice future for the present
>ignoring aggression in hopes of gaining illusory peace

Netanyahu - days when Jewish ppl remain passive in face of genocidal enemies: those days are over.

NETANYAHU:
We are no longer scattered among the nations powerless to defend ourselves.
We've restored our sovereignty & ancient home

NETANYAHU: Soldiers who defend our home have boundless courage.

NETANYAHU: For the first time in 100 generations, we, the Jewish ppl, can defend ourselves.

[Applause somewhat less enthusiastic on the 'we can defend ourselves' section of Netanyahu speech (it seems to me)]

NETANYAHU:
As PM of Israel can promise you one more thing: even if Israel has to stand alone, Israel will stand.

[Enthusiastic Senate applause to: I know that America stands with Israel ... etc]

NETANYAHU: You stand with Israel b/c you know that the story of Israel is not only story of the Jewish ppl but of the human spirit that refuses again & again to succumb to history's horrors.

NETANYAHU:
Facing me, overlooking this august chamber, is image of Moses.
Moses led our ppl from slavery to gates of promised land.

NETANYAHU:
Before the ppl of Israel entered the land of Israel, Moses gave message that has steeled our resolve for 1,000s yrs

NETANYAHU: I leave you with [Moses] message today:
Be strong & resolute; neither fear no dread them.


NETANYAHU: May Israel & America always stand together, strong & resolute ... may god bless state of Israel & may god bless USA.

Lots of applause. NETANYAHU waving. Thanking. Prolonged applause. Walking chamber. Handshaking. Applause continues. Cuts out.
NOTE:

Netanyahu says Iran gobbling countries, incl. Iraq.
BUT Iran is FIGHTING vs ISIS in Iraq

Tikrit — Iraq Shiite & Iraq Sunni alliance, mission overseen by Iran military official - http://on.rt.com/q4wvx5
 
COMMENT

The Ayatollah tweet referred to in the speech would be in relation to the then Israel bombing of Gaza (Operation Protective Edge 2014), concerning children that were killed by the Israeli military.  The reference to al Aqsa Mosque (third holiest mosque in Islam) would be in reference to whatever dispute had then been central between the Israelis and Muslims regarding the mosque.

It appears the mosque is at the centre of a 'Judaise' dispute (and other disputes) that have arisen out of the reclamation of the ancient Jewish homeland, after the passage of over 2,000 years of occupation and heritage attaching to yet another Levant people (Palestinians), who were under the rule of various empires (including Ottomans and the British), so it is a very unusual set of problems that give rise to ongoing animosities in Israel, Palestine and the region beyond.

Initially, I was sceptical.  But as the speech progressed, I was just about convinced of terrorism, the collapse of civilisation, medieval atrocities and a nuclear Armageddon coming our way.  Now I'm not that sure, although the medieval atrocities bogeyman is still scary.

The ace up Netanyahu's sleeve would have to be the secret nuclear development facilities, as that just doesn't sound right.  So who can argue with that?

What's interesting is that Pakistan (another Islamic state), which seems far more scary and chaotic than Iran, has nuclear arms.   Yet this development wasn't prevented by the Anglo-American side.

Israel is lobbying for continued sanctions and restrictions on Iran because Israel ostensibly sees Iran as an existential threat.  However, from what I've read, the prospect of a nuclear armed Iran is also a threat to Israel's hegemony in the region, so this is worth bearing in mind.

While there is much emphasis on common values, this is just persuasive window dressing.  Shared strategic interests play a far greater role in the Middle East than do extraneous cosmetic considerations, such as human rights issues.  We know that because Saudi Arabia isn't all that different to Iran in respect of human rights issues, yet Saudi Arabia isn't singled out as a threat to the world.

On the other hand, while Saudi Arabia is said to be funding militants in the region and funding Islamisation beyond the region, the Saudis aren't seeking to develop a nuclear capacity.  Or are they?

It would appear that Saudi Arabia is also gearing up to produce nuclear energy:
Saudi Arabia plans to construct 16 nuclear power reactors over the next 20 years at a cost of more than $80 billion, with the first reactor on line in 2022.
Nobody's complaining about Saudi Arabia's plans, so what's the issue with Iran?

The secret development sites came to mind, but then it occurred to me that maybe Iran was forced to engage in secret development because of the sanctions imposed on Iran.  So Iran's secrecy may not be as suspicious as it seems.

Between the nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors around the globe, you'd think that everybody would be looking at winding back to zero nuclear arms and zero nuclear energy rather than developing more of the same.

Is Netanyahu's war-like speech just bluff to put pressure on the Iran negotiations?  Is it a performance to justify imposition of sanctions on Iran?  Or is it a declaration of Israeli and US intentions?
















No comments: