TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  

January 27, 2015

Scoop Journalist Damian Pachter - Flight from Argentina - Alberto Nisman Death


Argentina /Alberto Nisman
Damian Pachter Article
Why I fled Argentina after breaking the story of Alberto Nisman’s death
In an exclusive column, Jewish journalist Damian Pachter – who first reported on the death of the special prosecutor – recounts the intimidation, the sleepless nights, the agent who stalked him and his ultimate decision to head for Israel.
By Damian Pachter | Jan. 25, 2015

So here they are, the craziest 48 hours of my life.

When my source gave me the scoop on Alberto Nisman’s death, I was writing a piece on the special prosecutor’s accusations against President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, her (Jewish) Foreign Minister Héctor Timerman, two pro-Iran “social activists” and parliamentarian Andrés Larroque. I learned that Nisman had been shot dead in his home.

The vetting process wasn’t too tough because of my source’s incredible attention to detail. His name will never be revealed.

Two things stood in my mind: my source’s safety and people’s right to know what happened that day, though not necessarily in that order.

Of course, for both speed and the contagion effect, Twitter was the way to go. The information was so solid I never doubted my source, despite my one or two colleagues who doubted me because I only had 420 Twitter followers — a number now eclipsing 10,000.

As the night went on, journalists contacted me in order to get the news from me even more directly. The first to do so was Gabriel Bracesco.

Once I tweeted that Nisman had died, hundreds of people quickly retweeted the news and started following me. That was my first of many sleepless days.

You just broke the best story in decades,” lots of people said. “You’re crazy,” was another take. Either way, nobody questioned that the situation was very grave.

The following days were marked by a government trying to create an official story. First, the head of state suggested a “suicide hypothesis,” then a mysterious murder. They of course were not to blame. In anything.

That week I received several messages from one of my oldest and best sources. He urged me to visit him, but in those crazy days I underestimated his proposal.

On Friday I was working at the Buenos Aires Herald.com newsroom when a colleague from the BBC urged me to look at the state news agency’s story on Nisman’s death. The piece had some serious typos but the message was even stranger: The agency quoted a supposed tweet of mine that I never wrote.

Bus to nowhere

I cursed in anger, adding amid the profanity: “I’ll tweet this and then they’ll see.” But I waited a few minutes to cool down and realized that this tweet was a kind of coded message.

So I bounced it off my friend, who said: “Get out now and go to Retiro,” Buenos Aires’ central bus station. “And come visit me. You have to leave the city.” It was around 8:30 P.M.

I was very lucky: When I arrived a bus would be leaving in two minutes. Where that bus was going I’ll never reveal either.

After several hours on the road, I arrived at the bus station, where I remained for a couple of hours. It turns out this was a big mistake: I think that was the place someone started watching me. But I didn’t realize it back then.

I didn’t want to stay too long in any one place, so I walked over to a gas-station joint nearby. My friend contacted me and said: “I’ll be there in 20 minutes.”

I was sitting around there for two hours or so when a very strange person came in. He wore jeans, a jeans jacket and Ray-Ban sunglasses. I noticed him immediately but stayed where I was. He was sitting two tables from me.

Suddenly I felt a finger on my neck and jumped like I never did my whole life.

“You’re a bit jumpy son” — it was my friend making one of his jokes. “You’re under surveillance; haven’t you noticed the intelligence guy behind you?”

“The one with the jeans and Ray-Bans?”

“Yeah.”

“What does he want?”

“Stay calm and look into my camera,” my guy said as he took my picture. Well, actually he took a picture of the intelligence officer, who left five minutes later. I have that picture here with me.

I then had to consider the best thing to do, because when an Argentine intelligence agent is on your tail, it’s never good news. He didn’t just want to have a coffee with me, that’s for sure.

Montevideo and Madrid

In any case, the decision came quick: I had to leave the country immediately. So I contacted one of my best friends, who got scared but understood the situation. We had to do it quickly, and I’m sure his efficiency saved my life. I will forever be grateful to him.

So I did it: I bought a ticket from Buenos Aires, to Montevideo, Uruguay, to Madrid to Tel Aviv.

I had to keep a low profile in order to get by the security forces. So I went back to the Retiro bus station — the scariest part of that long day. I was sure that if something happened, it would happen at the train station, a very dangerous place at night.

I had the feeling someone was after me and I’d get shot from some strange angle. But then I suspected my taxi driver even more. I figured he’d stray and take me off somewhere.

Meanwhile, text messages were sent to my two best colleagues, a friend and my mom. They were told where we would meet: Buenos Aires Airport. I couldn’t spend any time on the phone because I was being surveilled.

When my mother arrived she of course cried but remained calm. We discussed a few things and I told her to leave. Then my journalist friends came and we did an interview that has already hit Argentina’s top newspapers. I was flying back home, to Tel Aviv, as I always wanted to.

I have no idea when I’ll be back in Argentina; I don’t even know if I want to. What I do know is that the country where I was born is not the happy place my Jewish grandparents used to tell me stories about.

After I left Argentina I found out that the government was still publishing wrong information about me on social media. The Twitter feed of Casa Rosada, the Argentine presidential palace, posted the details of the airline ticket I had bought, and claimed that I intended to return to Argentina by February 2 — in other words, I hadn’t really fled the country. In fact, my return date is in December.

A tweet from the Presidential Palace showing Pachter's flight itinerary.

Argentina has become a dark place led by a corrupt political system. I still haven’t figured out everything that has happened to me over the past 48 hours. I never imagined my return to Israel would be like this.

COMMENT

Writer is telling us:

^^ An unnamed source gave him the Nisman death scoop
^^ Never doubted the source because of 'solid' information
^^ Source didn't have to be vetted, b/c of 'incredible attention to detail'
^^ Source:  'his' name will never be revealed.

Reference to 'attention to detail' and 'solid', convincing information, would indicate a source that had access to the crime scene, as that would be the 'detail' of relevance.
Reference to 'his name', would indicate a male source.
Mention of non-vetting of the source would perhaps indicate it is an untested (or new) source.
Guessing source is:  male, with access to crime scene & not previously known to Damian Pachter.  Alternatively, this is merely what Pachter wishes to convey and the source could be anyone but the unknown male with crime scene access.  LOL.

^^ For speed and contagion got scoop out on Twitter
^^ Journalists would call the writer for information on the scoop

Therefore the writer has become the central 'source' or central broadcaster, on behalf of whoever has given the information.  

What is puzzling is that the writer hadn't bashed out the massive scoop and published it himself, before the Twitter broadcast.

^^ Argentine state news agency:  "quoted a supposed tweet of mine that I never wrote."
Frustrating that we don't know what this fake or erroneous message was.
Even more frustrating when the writer asserts it was a 'coded message' but doesn't go on to convey what that message was.
Yet this appears to be the catalyst for the writer's departure from Argentina?

^^ Lucky breaks. Bus to unknown destination that will not be revealed.  But suspects someone watching him @ bus station -- so why not reveal bus station location, if likely already known?

^^ Suspects gas station Argentine intelligence agent (Denim & Raybans) on his tail.
^^ Friend takes photograph that captures photographic image of this suspected 'Argentine intelligence agent'

Hmmm .. why Argentine intelligence when it could be (a) just some guy (b) CIA (c) Mossad (d) Rogue Argentine intelligence (d) Perhaps other Argentine opposition player ... or (e) Some other player that is a stakeholder in the Nisman affair or fall of the Argentine government.
As a colleague from BBC gets a mention, I'm going to wager there's MI6 all over Argentina as well.
^^ Avoids phone calls as he suspects being surveilled -- but sends text messages, which would presumably also be surveilled (and a working mobile phone can pinpoint location).

A government agency would have no problems finding someone travelling with a mobile phone and/or texting whereabouts to friends/family members, or covering the finite number of international departure routes, I am guessing.

^^ Takes flight 'home, to Tel Aviv' - via Montevideo & Madrid

Aren't there direct flights to Tel Aviv?
---------------------------


Find it hard not to be sceptical.

The guy receives the scoop of the century but he doesn't bang out a story to publish it in a national Argentine newspaper (although he is a professional journalist).  Instead, he tweets -- as you or I would do and, wittingly or unwittingly, becomes the broadcaster for whoever fed him the story -- but we don't know who that is and it looks like neither does he, as he's taken the source as 'solid' without vetting what is likely an unknown or new source.

While the Nisman death information was most certainly solid, what remains unknown is the messenger and therefore the likely motive/agenda of the messenger -- if you're looking beyond just a report of a death.

If the source is someone who had crime scene access, as I suspect, that source is not necessarily government -- as any agent can get a foot inside government agencies (or, alternatively, government agency employees bribed etc -- especially in Argentina, where it has been exposed that two judges offered bribes in relation to the Nisman matter).
Actually, you probably don't even need to be at the death scene to get solid or detailed information.  USA's NSA gather data on everybody around the world.  Latin America's communications cables ALL go across USA, if I understand correctly.  So all you probably need is NSA contacts to have solid info on what goes on in Argentina and you don't even have to set foot on Argentine soil to have that information, although you can have agents on the ground receiving instructions.

CIA, Mossad and MI6 would all be likely NSA clients and collaborators.
So whoever broke ranks and broke the story via the writer could be controlled by anyone.

If the Argentine government can't get their act straight, and are alternatively pointing to a 'suicide hypothesis' and then a 'mystery murder', and if they are tweeting a bunch of crap on social media, wouldn't that indicate that they may not be the criminal masterminds behind the Nisman killing because if they were, wouldn't they have planned a better stance and cover than a bunch of confused social media crap?

All that being watched speculation could just be paranoia and, if the writer was being watched, it could be watched by anyone in a place like Argentina.

I'd be looking at right-wingers, CIA, Mossad and MI6 possibilities.

Also, while we're all enthralled by the drama of the flight of the scoop journalist away from Argentina, what is it that we're not examining in Argentina?

These are just some of the thoughts and feelings I have on the subject, taking a questioning perspective on what's presented.


No comments: