TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Book. Show all posts

February 14, 2016

Imperialism and Bread & Butter Pudding


221 page PDF

Imperialism: A Study (1902)
John A Hobson
English economist, social scientist
critic of imperialism
influenced Marxist theories of imperialism

http://www.cscd.osaka-u.ac.jp/user/rosaldo/Hobson_Imperialism_1902.pdf




---------------------- ----------------------


COMMENT



Above book  looks like it might be good reading (even though it's ancient).

Saved myself a copy of the PDF for checking out some time.


---------------------- ----------------------



In other news:  pigged out on bread & butter pudding.



[Click to ENLARGE image]



Used an amalgamation of recipes.  

Made this with buttered stale bread; x5 eggs; 50/50 milk & cream @ 250ml each; 3/4 cups of caster sugar; splash of vanilla essence; loads of brandy & sultanas; and some melted  jam (microwave), which I poured on at the half-way mark of layering the bread, before finishing the remainder of bread layering and pouring on the cream/milk & egg mixture over the lot.

Didn't bother taking off the crusts, as I think discarding crusts is wasteful. 

The whole thing gets soaked before going in the oven at 190 degrees Celsius for about 30 minutes and at 160 for about 20 mins, standing in a pan of water.

Got a bit carried away with the sugar & cinnamon on top.  Did three dessert spoons of sugar, which is waaaaaay too much on top.









October 11, 2015

Transcript - Julian Assange Interview - Hamish & Andy, Oct 2015

Assange
Transcript
Source

Hamish & Andy Audio - Oct 2015
http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/e/c/f/ecf7164bb3b333a5/Julian_Assange_Interview.mp3?c_id=9990803&expiration=1444478324&hwt=a6576deb465d02a68cbd40bd7149d0c3



JULIAN ASSANGE

ꕤ  Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

TRANSCRIPT
[for quotation purposes, confirm audio]
Updated


Assange Interview

Hamish & Andy Show Podcast

http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/e/c/f/ecf7164bb3b333a5/Julian_Assange_Interview.mp3?c_id=9990803&expiration=1444478324&hwt=a6576deb465d02a68cbd40bd7149d0c3



[skip intro]


Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

Hello.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

G'day, this is Julian Assange here.

Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

Hey, Julian, this is Hamish from the Hamish & Andy Show.

Mate, thank you so much for taking the time.

I'm just about to put you through to Andy.

You'll just be talking to Ando.

This is actually part of a segment where each of us tried to find a person that the other person would love to interview.

Julian Assange
WikiLeaks

Uh-ha.
Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

I'm brining you to Andy as the gift.
Julian Assange
WikiLeaks

I see. I see. I've gotcha.

Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

He got me Jeff Probst from Survivor.

Ummm, absolutely no offence to you. I think your story's fascinating. But I've already used my interview up.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

The other one has to do the leg work.

Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

Yeah. That's right. He got me Jeff.

I've had a great time.

Available for download [ skip ] ...

But I won't chew up any more of your time.

I'm going to pop you through to Andy.

And best of luck.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Julian.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

G'day Andy.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Hey, thanks for taking the time.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

You're welcome.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Ummm, I'd imagine you've had a lot of in-depth political conversations with extremely informed interviewers.

Ummm, I'm just letting you know that this is probably not that interview.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Rarely. Rarely.

[Laughter]

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

OK. Good. Good.

[Laugher]

But I am certainly fascinated about your story, and also obviously the new book, The WikiLeaks Files, which is out now -- which we'll cover off.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yes.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

But I want to start, if I may, with the asylum thing and the fact that you are there in the Ecuadorian embassy.

What is the set up?

What is the set up, where do you live and what's the set up there?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So, right now, I'm in the Ecuadorian Embassy of London, in a police siege -- the longest running police siege ever -- surrounded by a hundred (100) full-time equivalent police from the British government.

I've been detained (without charge in any country) in the United Kingdom, for five (5) years.

And there's a series of court cases proceeding. Criminal court cases, civil court cases, in different countries: in the UK, in the United states, in Sweden, in Saudi Arabia, in Germany, in Australia, Denmark [and] Iceland.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Mmmm-mmmm.

And they're the one--

--and so, I suppose that's the reason why you sought asylum.

You obviously don't want to face those charges at the moment.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

I have not been charged.

It's an important thing to remember.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes, I'm sorry. They want you for questioning.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, there's quite a large number of cases.

The serious one is the US case, where there's a pending prosecution for espionage; in relation -- you were talking the Swedish case -- in relation to the Swedish case, I have already been cleared in that quote 'preliminary investigation' unquote.

The state of play now is it's still a 'preliminary investigation'.

They have refused to take my statement in five (5) years.

Nothing has happened in the case in five (5) years.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

So, how long do you plan to wait, if those investigations around the world and those case -- like you mentioned, the one for espionage?

Did you you have a plan when you sought asylum?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

My plan was to--

It was a very dangerous and difficult environment outside the embassy.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

And, so, yeah. There was a strategic plan, which is to--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[interjects]

Avoid them [laughter].

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

--seek and receive asylum, both in a legal sense and in a practical sense -- and get into a country that was safer.

The first part of that has been successful.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.


Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So, I've won the asylum case.

Ummm, and that then changes a little bit the legal and political character of everything else that happens, because it has been a formal founding that I have been politically persecuted by the United States.

But we still now have to achieve the practical component.

The UK's in violation of international law.

But so was the Iraq war, right?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So, it's a bit hard to force a big state to obey the law.

That's a matter of politics.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

So, on that point, how does one go about trying to seek asylum?

Was Ecuador your first choice?

Do you ring around a number of embassies?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

We looked at about twenty (20) different countries and we were negotiating with a variety of them.

Ecuador just got its boots on the ground first, as a kind of practical measure.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

And as you mentioned, I mean, British police have been out the front of that building for so many years. Ummm, they're waiting for you to come out in--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

[interjects]

Well, they've been around the building and in surrounding buildings, which are owned by Harrods, which they have struck a deal with.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

They've been inside the building. They hide behind the toilet on the exit stairwells. On the rooftops they have surveillance teams all over the place. It's a big operation.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

So where do you think--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

-- They admit that they've spent more than twelve (12) million pounds on it so far.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Wow.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

More than fifteen (15) million Australian dollars.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

And, so, where is safe for you within that building, and what's your sleeping arrangements like?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Within the building?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, nowhere is safe.

They have managed to gain control from time to time of the floors above and below.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah, wow. And, and--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

And they've been caught doing that.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah, OK.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Ummm, they've even planted bugs in the ambassador's office.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Could they release [???] to us now?

6:57

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Almost certainly.

I mean, the United Kingdom -- it's come out in the Snowden revelations -- intercepts everything passing in and out of the UK automatically, regardless of whether it was me or not.

But, specifically, the GCHQ, the UK's electronic spy service was revealed to be spying on us. Yes.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Wow.

I mean, you're probably used to that now, but that seems quite exciting -- err, for me [laughter].

Ummm, lets--

7:30

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

I mean, it is exciting, generally speaking.

But it's, you know, it's a bit difficult on my family and a bit -- well, frankly, it's bloody unjust being detained without charge for five (5) years--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

And intrusive, I'd imagine.

Well, talking of your family--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

-- it's just not right.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

--how do you get a chance to meet with family and friends?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

With extreme difficulty.

Because of the surveillance operation, people who come to the embassy run the risk of being exposed. Very likely to be exposed.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So, people who I don't want the UK government being able to -- and its allies to have some pressure on -- obviously can't come to the embassy.

8:12

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Of course. For their own safety.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yeah.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah.

So how do you pass your days? Do you have the internet in there?

I imagine it would be tapped as well.

Is there a gym? Is there sunlight?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, it's-- it's very interesting that people have that question.

It actually reveals something about the way people think about what people do and that doing is somehow coupled to progressing through the physical environment. There's that assumption, but--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

8:40

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

--you know, I'm a -- which I like to do.

But I do intellectual work, so I write books and I manage an organisation that's spread out all over the world, and its involves really serious stuff, and is fighting all these court cases and banking blockades and so on.

So, actually, there's more work to do when you're stuck in an embassy than when you're not stuck at an embassy.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[laughter]

I understand that.

But, I mean, a lot of people to do their work -- and need to be stimulated, you know, by some things -- the idea of exercise can stimulate the brain. These things, I mean, do they come readily to you every day, or are there ways that you can tune out?

9:20

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, I mean, it's like being on a submarine, right?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Maybe Australian navy people [???] submarines--

It's very--

Well, they don't go down for three years.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

No, three (3) years would be a long dive [laughter].

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Three (3) years, no sun. They don't do that.

But on the other hand, they don't have such interesting visitors, either.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah.

I mean, WikiLeaks the website, a global phenomenon.

It's divided people, as you are well aware and I think all our listeners would be well aware.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Not really.

[Laughter]

Not really. It's divided some bullshit commentators.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[Laughter]

9:55

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

It's certainly divided the Pentagon and it's divided some politicians that have been exposed, but we have global polling across twenty-four (24) countries, so it's not really divided.

We have overwhelming support across twenty-four (24) countries.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

No doubt.

And amazing that you've obviously been able to win these awards, even though there's allegations against you of espionage, or at least an interest in that area from the US government.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yeah.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

But, you know, it is a divisive topic. Explain to our audience--

10:22

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, even in the US -- we have forty percent (40%) support in the US.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Well, explain to our audience then why you think it must exist.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Why WikiLeaks must exist?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, it's existed nine (9) years now.

We actually have the most effective argument -- not the best argument, the most effective argument -- which is: it's now part of the status quo.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes, it is.

10:44

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

That the world has a place for WikiLeaks, simply by the fact that we've been around for nine (9) years.

But in terms of something more interesting than that: well, look the results.

We've published ten million (10,000,000) documents now, about every country in the world.

And it's about basic education.

That if you don't know what's happening in the world -- you can't escape reality, you can't stick your head in the sand -- sooner or later, reality will catch up with you, just like it did, say for example, in the Iraq war.

And while often it is because it happens to someone else, eventually, it will happen to you.

I mean, we're seeing that, for example, with this terrible mess that has been produced in Syria, which is starting to affect Australia now.

So it's not just something that can happen over there.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

No, I understand that and I think people would understand that freedom of information means that people will hide less and be better informed to make decisions.

Ummm, are there issues, do you think--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, it's the risk. It's also the risk.

Ummm, that if people in governments and major corporations can't be certain that they can keep their plans secret, that has a really powerful deterrent effect.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Even if they think the chance of their stuff -- you know, of us getting hold of their stuff is maybe only one in ten thousand, say -- that one in ten thousand chance really does have a deterrent effect.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah, it will probably hold people to kind of a higher moral code.

But do you think there are issues that need hiding?

If I threw an example to you, and I'm sure you've had this question before, but if you came across a document that's outlining a way to stop a terrorist plot and by posting it that might alert terrorists, is that where something where WikiLeaks would show discretion there?

12:41

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

We have got a lot of experience.

We've done thousands of cases and ten million (10,000,000) documents, and we have a record of never having got it wrong in relation to a single document, in terms of its accuracy, and no-one being physically harmed as a result; that even the US government has been able to find, and it was forced to say that -- the Pentagon was forced to say under oath in court.

So there are decisions to be made in relation to --

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Well, this one wouldn't be people [skip] ...

Like, this would be potentially alerting people so we don't catch them, I suppose.

13:22

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yeah, it's something that's on people's minds.

But there's a reason it's on people's minds, which is because every time the press exposes the Pentagon or, you know, an equivalent agency, killing people, they try to distract on the issue; and they try to change the topic and start talking about what journalists have done.

But there's, you know, a long history in the press of --

I'm not aware of a single case where the press has published national security related information and this has led to retribution that has resulted in physical harm of anyone ever.

Now, of course, one can theorise that maybe there are some cases.

But, in practice, it doesn't happen.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Well, many people agree with you.

You've won so many awards for your work while being in the Ecuadorian embassy.

Who accepts those awards for you on your behalf -- at the actual events?

I mean, do you do a little 'piece de video' [??], or send in someone along with a note?

14:29

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Sometimes we send someone along, sometimes they bring things back here.

Sometimes it's, you know-- it's really the whole team that deserves the award. It's why I am most prominently getting the lightning, there's quite a big team of people who do the actual work.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Do you feel there are days where the cause that you're fighting--

You know, it's obviously taken over your life in every extreme because you are confined to the embassy.

I mean, there would be days you yearn for normality. What are the key things you miss, do you think?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, I often get that question.

I'm not going to give the bastards the pleasure of saying what I miss.

They want very much to turn me into some kind of deterrent.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

I'm someone who has not even been charged, so I'm not going to get into the business of deterring people from following in my footsteps.

I want to encourage people to follow in my footsteps.

But, ummm--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

I appreciate that.

15:35

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

-- so [inaudible].

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep. Let me play on then.

Like you mentioned, there are so many cables and documents on WikiLeaks, it makes sense to me to put them in a book.

I'll tell you why.

It's because I don't know where to start sometimes.

If I went to WikiLeaks the website, there's just so much information.

So if it's a little bit easier to consume, potentially more people are going to do that.

Is that where you see the benefit of The WikiLeaks Files?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, we ended up with so much information.

Now we've done what Google has done.

We have a sophisticated search engine which is on the front page.

So you can put in some guy that your sister is about to go out with, or something, in the name.

We see quite a lot of that.

Yeah, so there's that way of doing things and that's fast.

But in terms of something more nuanced, yeah, that's why we wrote this book.

Because we wanted to see something much more in depth, in terms of looking at the structural relationships between countries.

Not just a little nugget here and there, but, you know, what's happening in Syria, for example, as far as our material is concerned -- does it give an insight into what is happening?

And it does.

I mean, it shows very clearly that we have, if you like, part of the plan the US started erecting from at least 2006 to overthrow the Syrian government. Well before the problems in the Arab Spring.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Is the book available in the US?

17:15
Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

It's available in the US, it's available in the UK, yeah.

The US is an interesting country.

In some ways it's better than the United Kingdom.

OK, it's a militarised country, which is problematic; a very large and powerful country.

On the other hand, if you look at concentrations of power, there is New York, Washington, California, broadly speaking, and the South. Texas.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes.

17:49

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Now, to make that more concrete, seventeen percent (17%) of corporate registrations are in New York, whereas if you look -- and that's the max -- the city with the most.

Whereas, if you look at the United Kingdom, more than eighty percent (80%) of corporate registrations are in London, [inaudible ???] are in London.

Just imagine how bad the US would be, if for the past four hundred (400) years, Washington was in the same place as New York, as LA, as Houston.

UK's a very tightly integrated society, with a conformist, controlling social structure.

So we see, in the US, a lot more support for me and WikiLeaks than we do here in the UK, because there's more freedom to be your own thing in the US -- somewhere in the US.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

OK.

And in their Constitution. And they feel that and fight for those rights vehemently.

18:54

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, they're rapidly eroding. But, yeah, part of the social make-up has the idea that there should be such a thing as free speech.

Obviously, it's being very quickly eroded, but yeah we have--

In practice that is translated to on the ground support -- significant support for us -- within the United States.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

You used to be (or, I read) -- and whether you like the term, I'm not sure -- a hacker.

And I read that you were hacking for good, not evil; and that's why authorities were lenient back in the day.

What type of -- again, the term 'hacking' --

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

No good deed goes unpunished, right?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[Laughter]

Yes.

What type of hacking did you get up to and what made it good?

I couldn't really quite understand that bit.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, there's--

I don't like this term. I mean, it's used as a propaganda term.

Steve Jobs was also a hacker.

Bill Gates was also a hacker.

At the same age -- which is, you know, when I was a teenager.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Is there another term you'd like to replace it with?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

No, I don't.

I think it's a perfectly nice term.

It's been bastardised because now you've got these, you know, Eastern European mafia hacking your grandmother--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[Laughing]

Yeah.

20:12

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So people don't like it.

But in terms of exploring the early internet, before, you know, normal people were allowed on the internet, while it was still a military and research object, yeah, I was there, you know, reading Pentagon generals' e-mails each night when I was seventeen.

And it starts to give you a--

You know, Australia's a pretty isolated place, so it starts to -- it allows you to, sort of, see a little bit about how the world is actually structured from the inside.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Can you remember that feeling, when you first got in and you realised that you could go in and read the Pentagon's e-mails?

Can you remember that feeling?

20:56

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yeah, it's a sort of buzz that you get that is like, you know, like any kind of -- like parachuting or something like that.

The same adrenalin producing activity--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

--exhilarating.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

--but -- but, also has an intellectual and political side.

So it's also a buzz associated with learning, not just the risk of the experience but, you know, that you're learning about the world in some important way.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

For someone so--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

It is a-- it is quite an amazing thing to be involved in, especially then.

Now everyone can go onto the internet.

You know, you can get half that. Half that.

But, you know, reaching out into the world and understanding information.

You know, we can all log onto the internet and do a lot of that now, but back then the internet in Australia was only available to computer hackers and a couple of research institutes.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[Laughter]

Which is incredible.

For someone so well informed about the cyber world, do you think our society is too exposed online and, you know, the lay person here and people that aren't super into it -- and our audience may or may not be -- but, from my perspective, I never really know how exposed we are.

What do you see the threats there for just everyday people?

22:12

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Look, it's really serious in the long-term.

For everyday people, there's a practical reality.

The big American internet companies -- Google, Facebook etc -- are constantly recording and intercepting what you're doing.

Because if you think you're just using Google when you go to Google search pages, it's not true.

It has trackers embedded in most websites, because it has deals with most websites to supply the ads of those websites, or tracking software that the websites use to collect statistics and so on, and it powers most smartphones.

So the activity on your smartphone goes to Google. It collects all that.

And then the National Security Agency ('NSA') and the FBI in the United States then stick their fangs into Google's data repositories and Facebook's as well, and they also have their own massive surveillance operation, and the Australian government through the ASD -- the Australian Signals Directorate -- also intercepts a lot of information as it goes in and out of the country -- in bulk -- and then exchanges this through what is known as the Five Eyes alliance, which is the alliance of intelligence agencies led by the United States, the NSA, in the Anglo-Christian countries.

It's probably, you know, unfamiliar with your listeners, but one of the great structuring principles of the world is what the relationships are between the deep states of various countries.

So between the intelligence agencies of the countries.

24:03

And there's a really intimate integration between Australia, the United States, the UK, New Zealand, and Canada, that has been around for -- well, essentially, since post World War II -- that has developed an ever stronger bond as time has gone by.

So, in some sense, we should look at those five countries on a geopolitical level as the one country.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah, I understand that.

So everyday use of our smart phones is essentially writing files on us and giving it straight to them.


Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, yeah, either because the traffic from your phone is going through these mass interception points that these various countries have set up, where data ingresses or egresses a country, goes across some fibre optic cable under the ocean, or because -- and the second factor, is starting to become more of a problem than the first one -- or because, Google is running your smartphone or you're using Facebook services.

And those large data repositories are accessible, not only by those companies and their affiliates, but by those jurisdictions.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Ah, Julian, I know I've gone over time but I just want to warp it up.

A couple of things.

Has your Spanish improved being there at the embassy?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

A bit. But, you know, I'm someone who, unfortunately, is constantly working in English. So it does distract your language ability when you're focused in one so heavily.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

And, I know that you were at North Queensland, when you were in Australia -- when you grew up -- ummm, are you aware that the North Queensland Cowboys won the NRL final?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

I am not.

I am not, but I'm pleased.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

They did on the Weekend. On Sunday.

So I thought -- I was hoping I'd be the first person to tell you.

I know you're not number one ticket holder, but congratulations to you and your people up there.

[Laughter]

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Thanks.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Julian, thank you, mate.

The WikiLeaks Files, out now everybody. Published by Verso and available at Booktopia and also in good bookshops.

Have a great day, and you're a very fascinating man.

I can very much appreciate how you've stuck to your guns.

It's inspiring.

Well done.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

OK.
Thanks, Andy.
Bye, Bye. Take care.


--- end: 26:25 ---

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

Other

UKUSA Agreement

multi-lateral secret treaty
between intelligence agencies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKUSA_Agreement




LATEST BOOK
Assange, Co-Author

The WikiLeaks Files
(2015) | here

POLITICAL PERSECUTION
 JULIAN ASSANGE
Australian Journalist

FAQ & Support


 JULIAN ASSANGE
Transnational Security Elite
Carving Up the World Using
Your Tax Money

September 17, 2015

Assange: US Will Do Everything to Overthrow ‘Unwanted’ Governments

Article
SOURCE
http://sptnkne.ws/Kd7



US Will Do Everything to Overthrow ‘Unwanted’ Governments - Assange

15:04 16.09.2015   http://sptnkne.ws/Kd7
The United States uses all its available resources to overthrow “undesirable” governments in other countries, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said, according to German website NEOPresse.

Washington uses everything from military intelligence to commercial organizations to remove foreign governments that it considers unwanted. At the same time, the United States keeps increasing its firepower, establishing military bases across the world.

The current American "empire" consists of over 1,400 military bases in more than 120 countries. Meanwhile, Russia has only 12 military bases, one of which is in Syria that the Americans are currently trying to close down. Washington tried to do the same in Crimea, Assange said.

The American government doesn't act on behalf of its people, but serves to the interests of largest US corporations, the WikiLeaks founder said.

The US government uses unorthodox methods to achieve its objectives — such as the use of mercenaries and other third parties to fight its wars, Assange said
Thus, if there is a government that the United States doesn't like and considers to be a threat to its perception of the world, Washington will do everything to try to get rid of it.

Assange, who has been residing in the Ecuadorian embassy in London under asylum for over three years, has been wanted for questioning by  Swedish authorities since 2010 over accusations of unlawful sexual coercion and rape.

The activist has denied the accusations, stating that Swedish extradition attempts are aimed at sending him to the United States, where he faces espionage charges for publishing thousands of leaked top-secret military documents and diplomatic cables online.
source
http://sputniknews.com/us/20150916/1027076965/us-spends-lots-of-resources-to-overthrow-foreign-governments-julian-assange.html

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
COMMENT

So that's 12 Russian military bases versus over 1,400 American military bases, in 120 countries.
And this is the staggering amount of American military spending versus what other nations spend - combined:

It's worthwhile considering these factors when the US, British, NATO and EU propaganda machines, in the service of the US empire, start making media noise about the threat of 'Russian aggression'.  lol
WikiLeaks have just published a book on the American empire and its geopolitical impact, and it sounds a really good read:
BOOK:
The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to US Empire
http://www.versobooks.com/books/1931-the-wikileaks-files

Transcript: Assange - UK-US Special Relationship - War On Syria, Corbyn, & The WikiLeaks Files  |  here

---------------------- ꕤ  ----------------------

Julian Assange
Australian Journalist
FAQ & Support
https://justice4assange.com/



August 29, 2015

Assange - What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the US Operates - Book: The WikiLeaks Files | Article Extracts-Summary - Part II


EXTRACTS | SUMMARY
[For quotation purposes, confirm original article]

PART II

RE: Book

The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to U.S. Empire (Verso, 2015)

----
SOURCE
Assange: What WikiLeaks Teaches Us About How the U.S. Operates
By Julian Assange 8/28/15
http://www.newsweek.com/emb-midnight-827-assange-what-wikileaks-teaches-us-about-how-us-operates-366364

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

National Security Religiosity 
& the International Studies Association


large body of literature exists re:
structural or realpolitik analysis of key institutions of US power

such approaches alone, lack explanatory power, given:

range of ritualistic & even quasi-religious phenomena

surrounding the national security sector in USA

Rituals, familiar:
  • flag-folding
  • veneration of orders
  • elaborate genuflection to rank
[grovelling / servility / on bended knee | fm Lat. genu (knee) flectere (to bend) - here]
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

National Security Sector
|  Priestly Class
WikiLeaks published documents bear: classification markings

type of national-security 'holy seal'

Reaction to WikiLeaks publication of documents
= two parallel campaigns:
One
  • downplaying
  • diverting attention
  • reframing
Two
internal campaign (digestion / processing of event)
When documents bearing classification seal are made public

= documents transmuted by US DoS into forbidden objects

As 'forbidden objects'
  • public/published classified US DoS docs
= become 'toxic' to the 'state within a state'
Over 5.1 million Americans (as of 2014)
= US 'state within a state' - ie those with active security clearances

As 'forbidden objects'
published classified US DoS docs
= also 'toxic' to extended periphery who aspire to USG economic or social patronage

Upon WikiLeaks disclosures:

hysteria and non-corporeality {and unreality?}

religions & cults imbue their priestly class with additional scarcity value

  • by keeping their religious texts secret from the public or the lower orders of the devoted

technique also permits priestly class
to adopt different psychological strategies
for different levels of indoctrination

national security sector ways embraced by those who have become sufficiently indoctrinated
= laughable to:
  • public; or
  • lower levels of 'clearance;'

    What is laughable, hypocritical, or Machiavellian
    =   embraced by those sufficiently indoctrinated or co-opted
    by those whose economic or social advantage lies in accepting that which they would normally reject

    Profaned Object - 'Contamination'
    False USG Claim

    Publicly, USG claimed falsely:
    = that anyone without a USG security clearance distributing “classified” documents is violating the Espionage Act of 1917 (USA)

    USG FALSE claims
    = work in the opposite direction:
    "orders the very people it publicly claims are the only ones who can legally read classified documents to refrain from reading documents"
    ... lest they be 'contaminated' by them

    Exact documents:

    • may be read by cleared staff when
    • issued from classified USG repositories
    • are, however, forbidden to same staff when
    • exact documents emerge from a public source

    US DoS mandates that:
    cleared employees of the national security state are:
    • to self-report any public domain contact with the newly 'profaned' object; and 
    • to destroy all traces of it;

      US Irrational Response

      classified cables (+ other docs)
      published by WikiLeaks (& associated media)
      = completely identical to the original versions (ie they are electronic copies)

      By implication
      'Holy' US DoS classified docs 
        • acquire non-physical property / that is a 'magical' property 
        • and this 'holy,' 'magical' property received upon USG classification:
        is EXTINGUISHED by making document PUBLIC

          Devotees of National Security State
          • do not consider docs made public to be merely:
          • devoid of 'magical' property (bestowed by classification 'holy' seal); or 
          • rendered a mundane object on publication
          Devotees of National Security State
          consider documents made public
          as having become
          = inhabited by another non-physical property: an evil one
          Such religious thinking consequences:
          • excuse used by USG to block millions of people
          working for the 'state within a state' from reading:
          = over 30 different WikiLeaks domains
          = other outlets publishing WikiLeaks materials:
          • The New York Times
          • Guardian
          • Der Spiegel
          • Le Monde
          • El País
          2011 | USG Sent 'WikiLeaks Fatwa'
          to every:
          • federal govt agency
          • every federal govt employee
          • every federal govt security contractor
          Declaration of Official 'Enemy' - Proclaiming
          WikiLeaks disclosures
          caused damage to national security
          Declaration of 'Forbidden Object' - Proclaiming
          classified information
          'remains classified'
          irrespective of availability on public websites
          & availability via media disclosure
          Proclamation | 'Confession'
          contractors "shall report its existence immediately"
          Proclamation | 'Cleansing'
          Companies are:
          1. "to delete the offending material"
          2. & to clear even the "internet browser cache"
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          ACADEMIA
          INTERNATIONAL & PUBLIC RELATIONS

          Columbia University
          School of International & Public Affairs
          following US DoS contact
          warned students:
          “not post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites ..."
          Consequence invoked (leverage) that accompanied warning:
          "Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government."

          An array of govt depts & other entities, incl

          Library of Congress
          blocked internet access to WikiLeaks
          US National Archives
          = even blocked searches of its own database for “WikiLeaks”

          Pentagon prosecutors
          re Manning trial (alleged source Cablegate cables)
          = unable to receive important emails from judge & defence
          Rather than remove filter,
          Pentagon implemented clumsy new procedure:
          • check the filter daily for blocked WikiLeaks-related emails
          • set-up of alternate, special e-mail addresses for prosecution
          US National Security Sector Religious Hysteria
          = laughable to those outside the US national security sector

          US National Security Sector Religious Hysteria

          INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
          = serious poverty of analysis of WikiLeaks publications
          in US in international relations journals

          OTHER SCHOLARS
          scholars in disciplines
          eg law, linguistics, applied statistics, health & economics
          = not deterred

          eg - Entropy statistics journal
          DeDeo et al. (US or UK nationals)
          write that:
          WikiLeaks   |   Afghan War Diary 
          “is likely to become a standard set for both the analysis of human conflict and the study of empirical methods for the analysis of complex, multi-modal data.”
          [entropy = (Communications & Information) a measure of the efficiency of a system, such as a code or language, in transmitting information - fm. Gk - here]

          COURTS & INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS
          • extensive use of WikiLeaks materials esp. cables
          • in courts, incl. domestic courts
          • from UK to Pakistan

          INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS
          • extensive use of WikiLeaks materials

          from: European Court of Human Rights to International Criminal Tribunal


          CONTRAST POVERTY OF COVERAGE
          IN USA INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS JOURNALS

          in light of 1,000s of citations in the courts & in other academic areas
          = poverty of coverage, not merely odd
          = suspicious

          Such international relations journals
          DOMINATE study of international relations GLOBALLY
          =  should be natural home for analysis of WikiLeaks 2-billion word diplomatic corpus

          US-based International Studies Quarterly (ISQ)

          major international relations journal
          = adopted a policy against accepting manuscripts based on WikiLeaks material
          *even where it consists of quotes*
          *or derived analysis*
          ISQ
          = acknowledged it's currently:
          in an untenable position until such time as there is a change in policy by International Studies Association (ISA)
          International Studies Association (ISA)
          = over 6,500 members worldwide
          = dominant scholarly association in the field
          = publishes:
          • Foreign Policy Analysis
          • International Political Sociology
          • International Interactions
          • International Studies Review
          • International Studies Perspectives
          ISA
          = almost HALF of 56 members on its governing council:  professors 'international service' type academic USA university departments 
          *Such university departments:
          = feeder schools for the US DoS and other internationally-oriented areas of govt

          ISA President (2014-15)
          = Prof Amitav Acharya
          School of International Service
          American University in Washington, DC
          ISA
          = banned single most significant US foreign policy archive from appearing in its academic papers
          = otherwise, presumably, against its institutional & academic ambitions
          ISA ban
          = calls into question its entire output
          = undermines an output that has influenced how the world understands role of US in international order

          Type of Academic Fraud

          = closing of ranks within the scholar class around the interests of Pentagon & DoS

          = exclusion of primary sources for non-academic reasons is to lie by omission

          = distortion of the field of international relations (& related disciplines)
          by proximity of its academic structures to the US govt

          = such close-proximity academic structures
          lack even even have the independence of the frequently deferential New York Times

          Distortion of Study of International Relations
          & Censorship of WikiLeaks

          = significant opportunity: to present an analysis of international relations free of censorship of classified materials

          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          Other
          Fatwa
          =  "an Islamic religious ruling, a scholarly opinion on a matter of Islamic law. A fatwa is issued by a recognized religious authority in Islam."  |  here

          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          COMMENT
          Not sure what is meant by 'non-corporeality' ... some kind of disembodied hysteria?  lol

          Or, maybe something immaterial and therefore invalid?

          Not sure if I'm on the right track. 
          Going with unreality re 'non-corporeality' mentioned in article (as follows):
          "hysteria and non-corporeality"
          Article's a good read.