UK - Philip Hammond - Interferes With Independence of British Judicial System

UK - Philip Hammond Interferes With  Independence of British Judicial System British State Bullies British Justice -------/\/\/ PHILIP HAMMOND -- British Conservative, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs -- is INTERFERING WITH THE INDEPENDENT DECISIONS OF THE BRITISH JUDICIARY (article below), attempting to politicise and PRESSURE British justice. Has he no shame? Apparently not ... Whenever justice decides against British government agenda, the result is PREDICTABLE ...  Like a well trained pooch, Hammond barks on command. Here he is barking for his masters before the controlled British media, at politically persecuted Australian journalist, Julian Assange. Note, also, the backdrop of a spot of  British bother over Afghanistan. And let's not forget illegal war on Iraq. Psssssssssssst ... notice how the reaction is entirely welcoming when the agenda suits. Oh, dear. No wonder this naughty doggie is yapping ... Bad doggie! Hammond Background / Summary info source - bbc http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28310255 Philip Hammond -- big prize in govt. reshuffle -- gained 'great office of state': foreign secretary ISRAEL: *Expect Hammond to continue support of Israel.  [Comment:  as if anyone would expect otherwise, BBC.] AFGHANISTAN: Huge controversial UK sacrifice in Afghanistan. Hammond, ex Defence Sec., familiar with front line, as frequent lying visitor etc. IRAN: Rebuilding of UK bilateral relationship with Iran on agenda. [comment:  same for USA, but ... CIA & MI6 brought down an elected Iran PM in 1953 so I would be very cautions of this 'rebuilding' business more likely:  they want to get close enough to effectively undermine Iran from within *there's a policy of getting close to Iran & Cuba for a reason:  they're targets for exploitation or destruction for sure.] SYRIA: Slap head William Hague humiliated by MP refusal to back UK military action against Bashar al-Assad over the .. ehem ... false flag 'chemical weapons' LOL ... BBC reports Hague was 'scarred' by: -- the sensible decision of fellow MPs (which was ignored) -- "Western failure to prevent" "civil war" Yeah.  Sure. BBC's a joke that falsified film footage BBC knows the West is responsible for what it refers to as 'civil war' terrorism fomented & supported by the West in Syria EUROPE: Hammond reportedly 'Eurosceptic' How does Hammond inspire Commons rebellion against Brussels while not alienating other EU states & entrenching refusal to give ground over key UK change negotiations, BBC asks ... ...  leading the sheeple to believe that this is a genuine matter of choice. William Hague also described as 'Eurosceptic'.   Hague was a devoted US lackey. Watch what Hammond says for key breaking points (or propagandised ones) re in or out of EU, we're told. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28310255 COMMENT:   I don't believe this for one minute.  As if they're being straight. The European Union is probably a US-Anglo bankers and economists project. -------/\/\/ Other: Hammond on: French port of Calais: "millions" of "marauding" migrants No mention of British, US, Israeli, Saudi, United Arab Emirates & Gulf friends' part in conflicts across both the Middle East and Africa -- nor mention of who is collectively responsible for failing to secure European borders. And there's the French and the Italians in the thick of it, as well as the European Union, NATO and the corrupt United Nations clowns. Oh, and the dutiful US-Anglo empire colonial war teams. And last, but not least, I'm sure that International Monetary Fund and World Bank would deserve some credit somewhere (probably somewhere in Africa) ... and most definitely for support and encouragement of the migration tsunami at its height in Europe, in IMF's case. It's not the 'international community' -- it's a SUPRANATIONAL MAFIA. -------/\/\/ RT News https://www.rt.com/uk/336904-saudi-billionaire-diplomatic-hammond/ British FM berates judge for stripping Saudi billionaire of diplomatic immunity Published time: 23 Mar, 2016 15:17 Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond has criticized a High Court judge for stripping a Saudi billionaire of his diplomatic immunity so that he can face divorce proceedings. Hammond bluntly said the ruling “should not be upheld or endorsed” and warned it could have repercussions for British diplomats posted abroad. The High Court dismissed as “spurious” claims from Saudi businessman Sheikh Walid Juffali that he has diplomatic immunity due to his work with the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Juffali is being sued for a share of his £4 billion (US$5.65 billion) fortune by his ex-wife, the former Pirelli calendar model Christina Estrada. The couple divorced in 2014 following 13 years of marriage. Juffali began divorce proceedings in 2012 after he married Lebanese supermodel Loujain Adada in Saudi Arabia, where men can legally have up to four wives. Juffali’s name first appeared on the London Diplomatic List as a permanent representative to the IMO for the Caribbean island of St. Lucia in September 2014, according to the Telegraph. A November 2015 investigation by the newspaper found there was no public record of Juffali attending any meetings of the IMO and stated he possesses no known qualifications in maritime law. [ ... ] Hammond is quoted in the Guardian as criticizing the original legal decision to strip Juffali of his diplomatic immunity. The cabinet minister said the judge “erred in concluding that it was necessary (or permissible) for the court to ‘look behind’ the Foreign and Commonwealth Office certificate, which confirmed that [Juffali] had been appointed to the post of permanent representative of St. Lucia to the IMO and to consider whether (he) had taken up the post or exercised any functions in connection with it.” He argued that only an executive acting through the FCO using the royal prerogative can decide who is a diplomat. Last month, the High Court ruled the former prime minister of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani, was protected by diplomatic immunity from a lawsuit which claims agents acting on his behalf falsely imprisoned and tortured a British citizen. Following that ruling, junior FCO minister James Duddridge said that “it is ultimately for the court to decide whether a foreign diplomat in the UK enjoys immunity in any particular case.” https://www.rt.com/uk/336904-saudi-billionaire-diplomatic-hammond/ -------/\/\/ Decision Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 176 Case No: B6/2016/0548 IN THE COURT OF APPE AL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION MR JUSTICE HAYDEN FD14F00410 https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/approved_judgment_rhd_estrada_v_juffali.pdf ---------------------- ----------------------